Global Connectivity from a Single Source
Trusted Advisor for IT & Telecommunications Sourcing
Why Centralized Sourcing Is the Key to Success for International Network Projects
Global Connectivity
Any company with an international presence is familiar with this problem:
Every location has its own story when it comes to connectivity.
Local ISPs, varying contract terms, incompatible SLAs, and a lack of centralized monitoring—the result is a patchwork of dependencies that works in day-to-day operations but doesn’t really satisfy anyone when a problem arises.
In this context, the solution lies less in the technology itself than in the way connectivity is procured and managed.
Centralized sourcing through a carrier-neutral partner is the structural lever that gives companies more control, better SLAs, and true cost transparency—without sacrificing local flexibility.
>20%
Ersparnis
99,99%
Verfügbarkeit
24/7
Support
The “Many Providers” Problem—and Why It’s More Than Just an Organizational Issue
International companies rarely procure their bandwidth centrally. Typically, the local IT team in France buys from three regional ISPs, the Singapore office negotiates with competing telcos, and the U.S. office combines a national carrier with a local cable provider. When a location goes down, the call ends up with the global IT director—who, however, does not have a complete overview of the infrastructure.
The real problem isn’t the number of providers, but the lack of a centralized perspective: no uniform monitoring, no coordinated incident management, and no consolidated view of costs. The result is longer downtime, higher operating costs, and an IT organization that spends more time on coordination than on strategic development.
Three Structural Weaknesses in Fragmented WAN Operations
1. Performance data without a common denominator
Available performance data is not the same as actionable performance data. A large managed service provider delivers real-time dashboards with a detailed view of SaaS—a small regional ISP sends a daily updated spreadsheet via email. In between, there’s every possible variation. What’s missing is a consolidated view that maps all locations and technologies to a common metric level.
A particularly critical issue: While SD-WAN platforms provide reliable overlay statistics, they often obscure the underlay. Without visibility into what’s happening on the physical link, users can only guess at the cause of disruptions—and end up wasting valuable time with providers pointing fingers at each other.
2. Incompatible SLAs without a uniform liability framework
The main office is connected via DIA with a guaranteed gigabit connection; branch offices use business broadband; and a remote office somewhere in a rural area is connected via a single fiber-optic line with no diversity option. Each of these connections has its own SLA—with different availability guarantees, MTTR values, and escalation procedures.
What companies need in this situation is not a compromise, but a clear minimum SLA that applies across the entire network. They need a central point of contact who coordinates all involved carriers in the event of an outage—without the internal IT department having to act as a trouble-ticket service provider between multiple providers.
3. The Contract Landscape as a Risk in Its Own Right
Even a single business internet contract contains dozens of pages of fine print. Multiply that by a dozen locations in different countries—each with its own legal framework and different contractual practices—and the result is an administrative burden that ties up resources and creates opportunities for error. Cancellation deadlines are missed, price adjustments are overlooked, and renewals are triggered automatically.
The cleanest solution: a single master agreement covering all carriers and locations, with a consolidated invoice and a common governance model. This is nothing new in theory—but in practice, it can only be achieved by an experienced aggregator that brings the necessary carrier relationships and legal expertise to the table.
Single Pane of Glass: Control Starts with Visibility
The key concept behind centralized WAN sourcing is the “single pane of glass”—a unified management and monitoring interface that consolidates all connectivity data regardless of location or technology. No more parallel dashboards, no more manually consolidating exports from different portals.
What such a platform must be able to do in practice:
- Real-time overview of KPIs such as latency, packet loss, and jitter for all connected locations
- Continuous comparison of actual performance against the agreed-upon SLA
- Automated alerts for impending SLA violations—before users are affected
- Integrated management of all service data: contract terms, renewal dates, carrier details, contact persons
- Self-service features for new locations: budget requests, design options, and ordering—all in one place
Particularly valuable: Centralized monitoring makes it possible to verify true redundancy. Anyone who wants to ensure that two connections are truly diversified—and not secretly running over the same physical fiber —needs insight into the underlying infrastructure. An ISP aggregator with carrier access and a monitoring platform can reliably answer this question.
The Savecall Approach: Carrier-neutral, global, and all-in-one
Savecall does not position itself as a carrier, but rather as a strategic procurement partner that acts as an intermediary between companies and the global carrier market.
The result: IT decision-makers gain negotiating power, transparency, and operational efficiency—without the hassle of managing dozens of carrier relationships themselves.
- Carrier Portfolio
Over 80 carrier partners worldwide—both regionally and globally. Savecall selects the best provider for each location, rather than using its own network. - Procurement & Negotiation
Price Comparison, RFP, and Contract Negotiation—Savecall brings market knowledge and volume to the table. - Contract Management
One master agreement, one invoice. Savecall consolidates all carrier relationships on the customer side. - Monitoring & SLA
Centralized performance monitoring across all locations. A single point of contact for incidents and escalations. - Scaling
No proprietary network interests. Savecall recommends the best solution in each case—regardless of commission structures. - Carrier neutrality
No proprietary network interests. Savecall recommends the best solution in each case—regardless of commission structures.
Conclusion: Sourcing is a strategy
The decision on how a company procures its global connectivity has a direct impact on operational stability, costs, and the IT organization’s ability to act. Those who continue to procure connectivity in a decentralized and reactive manner gain short-term local autonomy at the expense of global controllability.
Centralized ISP sourcing through a carrier-neutral partner structurally resolves this conflict of interest: more carrier options, better terms, standardized SLAs, and monitoring that actually enables control—rather than merely simulating it.
Written by
Frank Frommknecht
Key Account Consultant, SAVECALL
Has been helping companies select and optimize their networking solutions for over 20 years. His focus: making complex telecommunications understandable from the customer’s perspective and strategically identifying the right solution.
Why
Telekom & IT-Sourcing.
Weltweit. Carrier-Unabhängig.
Auswahl & Betrieb weltweiter Connectivity- & Cloud-Infrastruktur. Ohne Vendor-Risiko & unnötige Kosten.
- 80+ Carrier weltweit
- EIN Dashboard
- EIN Ansprechpartner
- EIN SLA
- Min. 20% Einsparung
25+
Jahre Erfahrung
40+
Mitarbeiter
80+
Partner
1400+ Kunden
Was Sie weiterbringt – &
bewegt
Kostenlose Expertenberatung buchen
EIN Kontakt. ALLE Carrier.
+FAQ
Sie fragen.
